Retrieval-Augmented Generation — RAG — has become one of the most widely deployed patterns in enterprise AI. The core idea is simple: instead of relying on an LLM's training data alone, you retrieve relevant information from your own knowledge base at query time and include it in the prompt. The result is answers that are grounded in your actual data, not hallucinated.
What a Production RAG Pipeline Looks Like
A production RAG pipeline has several components: an ingestion pipeline that processes your documents, an embedding model that converts text into vectors, a vector store that indexes those vectors for fast retrieval, and a generation layer that takes the retrieved context and produces a response.
For enterprise deployments we typically use Azure OpenAI for both embeddings (text-embedding-ada-002) and generation (GPT-4). LangChain provides the orchestration layer. For the vector store, Pinecone and Azure AI Search are both solid choices — the latter integrates cleanly with the rest of the Azure ecosystem.
Chunking Strategy: The Most Underestimated Decision
The most underestimated part of building a good RAG system is the chunking strategy. How you split your documents has a massive impact on retrieval quality. Too large and you retrieve too much noise; too small and you lose context. Semantic chunking — splitting at meaningful boundaries rather than fixed token counts — consistently outperforms naive approaches.
Hybrid Retrieval: Combining Keyword and Vector Search
Pure vector search has a blind spot: it's good at semantic similarity but often misses exact matches on specific terms — policy numbers, product codes, legal citations — that a keyword search would catch instantly. The fix is hybrid retrieval, which runs both a vector search and a traditional keyword (BM25) search in parallel, then merges and re-ranks the results.
In our deployments, hybrid retrieval consistently outperforms vector-only search on enterprise document sets, precisely because enterprise queries mix conceptual questions ('what's our policy on remote work') with exact-match lookups ('find contract ULT-2024-0187'). Azure AI Search and most modern vector databases support hybrid retrieval natively, so there's rarely a good reason to skip it.
Handling Multi-Tenant RAG Securely
For SaaS products or shared enterprise platforms, a critical requirement is that retrieval never leaks data across tenants or departments — a query from one customer should never surface a chunk of another customer's document, even indirectly. This needs to be enforced at the retrieval layer with metadata filtering on every query, not just at the application layer after results come back.
The safest pattern is to tag every chunk with its tenant and access-control metadata at ingestion time, then apply that filter as a mandatory pre-condition on the vector search itself — not as a post-processing step that could be forgotten in some code path. We treat this as a security requirement to be tested explicitly, not an implementation detail to trust by default.
Cost Optimisation at Scale
RAG costs scale with both storage (embeddings for every chunk) and inference (an LLM call on every query, often with a large context window). At enterprise document volumes, this adds up quickly. The highest-leverage optimisation is usually caching: many enterprise queries repeat or overlap significantly, and caching retrieval results — and even full responses for identical queries — can cut inference costs substantially without touching accuracy.
The second lever is right-sizing the generation model. Not every query needs your most capable (and most expensive) model — routing simple factual lookups to a smaller, cheaper model and reserving the larger model for complex, multi-document reasoning queries is a pattern we use on nearly every production RAG system.
Evaluation: Build It Early
Evaluation is equally important. You need a way to measure retrieval quality (are you finding the right chunks?) and generation quality (are the answers accurate and grounded?). Building an eval harness early saves significant pain later.
We've built RAG systems for insurance, legal and healthcare clients — each with different document types, latency requirements and compliance constraints. If you're planning a RAG implementation, get in touch and we can help you avoid the common pitfalls.
Want to explore this topic for your organisation?
Talk to our team →